A World Bank-initiated effort to reduce corruption in school funding in Uganda is widely, and rightly, celebrated for its results (click here and here for background). In the early nineteen nineties on average 87 percent of the monies the Ugandan central government budgeted for textbooks and other school supplies “leaked out” somewhere between departing the Finance Ministry and arriving at the school house front door. Yearly data revealed that 73 percent of the schools received less than five percent of the monies to which they were entitled, and only ten percent received more than half. The 1996 Bank project had an immediate effect on the rate of losses. By 1999 the government found schools were receiving on average 95 percent of what they were supposed to receive, and a 2002 World Bank study likewise showed a sharp drop in fund leakage.
The dramatic improvement is attributed to the enormous publicity the data on losses garnered. Parents were outraged and the government and donor agencies embarrassed. Within the development community, the Uganda Public Expenditure Tracking Survey, as the work to dig out and publicize the loss data became known, has been enormously influential, the story becoming a parable for how to fight corruption. A Uganda-like PETS project is now routinely prescribed for attacking corruption in public expenditures, and a Google search on “Uganda PETS” yields over 100,000 hits and returns some 20,000 citations on Google scholar.
But for all the attention the effort has generated, there is evidence that it may not have had any impact on the level of corruption in Uganda. It is possible that all it did was force those raking funds off the school fund program to turn elsewhere. The Uganda PETS thus may simply have displaced the corruption in the school funding program rather than ending it. Continue reading