Don’t Give Back that Glove General Holder!

Although few readers likely can find Equatorial Guinea on a map (hint: it’s that small square wedged between Cameroon and Gabon), many have heard its name in connection with the annual contest to identify the “most corrupt country.” For despite the always stiff competition from the likes of such states as Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan, Somalia, year-in-year-out Equatorial Guinea always manages to place at or near the top.  Observers attribute its perennially strong showing to a combination of two factors: 1) the country’s vast mineral wealth and 2) its rulers’ skill and ruthlessness in keeping it all for themselves.

Thanks to large deposits of crude oil and other natural resources, Equatorial Guinea is the fourth wealthiest nation in the world with a per capita income approaching $50,000.  Yet most Equatorial Guineans live in poverty.  Over half the population does not have access to clean drinking water, 47% are without access to safe plumbing, and more than 51% of primary school teachers lack adequate professional training.  As a result, the nation ranks at or near the bottom of cross-national indicators of development.  (Information in this post is from the NGO APDHE’s filing against the government at the African Peoples and Human Rights Commission.)

“Credit” for this appalling state of affairs goes to the nation’s president, H.E Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, his family, and allied families from the Esangui clan of the Mongomo region.   Through the creation and maintenance of a corrupt state they have managed to ensure that the country’s enormous wealth has gone to fund mansions and luxury automobiles in Spain, the United States, France,Brazil, and other countries for themselves and their cronies. Perhaps most notorious was the acquisition by Teodoro Nguema Obiang Mangue, the president’s son, of one of the gloves Michael Jackson wore during his “Bad Tour.”  He reportedly paid a half million dollars for the right to display it at his Malibu mansion.

A promising break in this depressing story of the pillage of a nation’s assets came in October 2011 when the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against the younger Obiang.  The Department alleged that the glove, the Malibu mansion, a Gulf Stream jet, and other trinkets totaling some $100 million the youngster had stashed in the United States were “the proceeds of foreign official corruption” and thus subject to seizure under U.S. law.  The suit is perhaps the most significant result of the Department’s Kleptocracy Initiative.  Launched under President Bush and strengthened under President Obama, the program brings civil and criminal cases in  American courts to seize assets of the Obiangs of the world whenever they have a connection to the United States.  Civil society groups around the world have applauded the initiative, and in the case of the Obiang case provided the Department with information to support it.

Many of these groups now worry that, thanks to political and diplomatic considerations, the Department may give up on its suit.  A tentative settlement has been reached, and rumors are swirling that it lets the Obiangs off the hook.  The settlement must be approved by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, and late on August 5, the Open Society Justice Initiative, APDHE, the Spanish group pursuing a similar case against the Obiangs in Spanish court, SHERPA, a French NGO that instigated a case against the family in France, and EGJUSTICE, a group of Equatorial Guinean citizens, wrote General Holder urging he reject any settlement that would go easy on the Obiangs.  Among other things the four asked the Attorney General was to ensure that —

– all forfeited funds are returned to Equatorial Guinea for the benefit of its citizens;

– the Obiangs and their cronies have no role in the allocation of the returned funds;

– those  benefiting from the funds not be subject to any retaliation; and

– anyone who assisted in the recovery of the funds be free from further harm and that in particular Roberto Berardi, an Italian national imprisoned and tortured in Equatorial Guinea for his role in the case, be immediately released and allowed to leave the country safely.

The Kleptocracy Initiative is one of the more promising efforts to curb the grand corruption rampant in many weak states.  This is not the time to weaken it.  General Holder, don’t give the Obiangs back that Jackson glove!

2 thoughts on “Don’t Give Back that Glove General Holder!

  1. Considering that “His Excellency” Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo and his wife were on the guest list for the dinner hosted by the White House last evening, it will certainly be no surprise to see their offspring off the hook soon…outrageous, unfortunate and sad!

  2. Text of letter sent U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder by UNCAC Coalition, a global network of over 350 civil society organisations in over 100 countries committed to promoting the ratification, implementation and monitoring of the UN Convention against Corruption:

    Berlin, 12 August 2014.

    The Honorable Eric H. Holder, Jr.
    Attorney General
    U.S. Department of Justice
    950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
    Washington, D.C. 20530

    Global settlement of corruption-related cases involving more than $70 million in alleged proceeds of corruption held by Teodorin Nguema Obiang

    Dear Attorney General Holder:

    I am writing to you on behalf of the UNCAC Coalition to express our concerns about the pending global settlement of corruption-related forfeiture actions involving more than $70 million in real estate and luxury goods held by Teodorin Nguema Obiang (TNO). The UNCAC Coalition is a global network of over 350 civil society organisations (CSOs) in over 100 countries, committed to promoting the ratification, implementation and monitoring of the UN Convention against Corruption (UNCAC).

    We laud the U.S. government’s enforcement initiatives to counter grand corruption and impunity and would like to encourage you to ensure that in the above-referenced cases the right message is being sent.

    The UNCAC Coalition has been following closely the forfeiture cases in question since their announcement by the Justice Department in October 2011. “We are sending the message loud and clear: the United States will not be a hiding place for the ill-gotten riches of the world’s corrupt leaders” then declared Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division.[1]

    Made in the wake of the Arab Spring, this announcement further coincided with the 3rd Conference of States Parties (CoSP) to the UNCAC in Marrakesh where governments renewed their commitments to deny safe haven to the proceeds of corruption and to enhance asset recovery efforts.

    The enforcement action was a major breakthrough in the global fight against grand corruption and impunity that gave concrete teeth to the U.S. Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative, which, as you stated during the 2010 African Union Summit, aims at “combating large-scale foreign official corruption and recovering public funds for their intended – and proper – use: for the people.”[2]

    Since the launch of the proceedings, several civil forfeiture complaints have been filed and/or amended. All of these complaints contain detailed and astonishing allegations of massive corruption and money-laundering practiced by TNO—including alleged extortion, misappropriation, and bribery—that the Department of Justice asserts underlay his extravagant lifestyle.

    The UNCAC Coalition salutes the genuine effort that the Department of Justice has made in pursuing these cases so far, as well as the transparency of the proceedings through the regular publication of court documents.

    While recognizing the difficulties encountered in the cases and the enforcement benefits of settlements, the UNCAC Coalition fears that the contemplated settlement may, if not properly framed, send the wrong message and set a harmful precedent. Such an outcome would be a major and regrettable step backwards that would undermine both the global anti-corruption fight and the U.S. Kleptocracy Initiative.

    To prevent this from happening, the UNCAC Coalition urges you to ensure that the final outcome truly serves justice by considering the following measures:

    The settlement should provide clear, detailed and accurate accounts of the facts and evidence.
    The settlement should include forfeiture of any and all the assets identified in the course of the proceedings that are believed to be the proceeds of corruption pursuant to the internationally agreed standards set out in the UNCAC. This is in line with the Asset Recovery Resolution that was adopted during the last CoSP in Panama: Taking into account the need to hold corrupt officials accountable by depriving them of their stolen assets.[3]
    The settlement should be in accordance with Chapter V of the UNCAC, which provides for the repatriation of illicit property to the country from which it was taken. In particular, and bearing in mind the “particular importance of the recovery of stolen assets for sustainable development” (Cf. Asset Recovery resolution adopted in Panama), the Department of Justice should take necessary measures to 1) ensure that assets are returned for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Equatoguinean people and 2) prevent said assets from being misused/recycled through corruption.[4] This may include establishing a trust fund for the Equatoguinean people into which the forfeited funds would be placed and subsequently disbursed for their benefit.
    The settlement should further address all the consequences of corruption in line with Article 34 of the UNCAC.
    The settlement should not preclude further enforcement action, whether by criminal or civil proceedings, against TNO himself or against the alleged accomplices and those who have allegedly engaged in, aided or abetted the laundering of proceeds of corruption in the U.S.
    The settlement should be subject to a judicial hearing and court approval in the U.S.
    The final agreement should be made publicly available by the Department of Justice.
    Such measures are critical for the effective and proper resolution of the cases and for the overall fight against corruption. Moreover, they are in line with both the objectives of the U.S. Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Initiative and the international commitments the U.S. made under the UNCAC. The UNCAC Coalition hopes the United States government will live up to its commitments.

    We thank you for taking the time to consider the views of the UNCAC Coalition on this important matter. We would welcome an opportunity to discuss our letter with you further.

    Yours sincerely,

    Dr. Manzoor Hasan
    Chair, UNCAC Coalition

    1) Department of Justice, “Department of Justice Seeks to Recover More Than $70.8 Million in Proceeds of Corruption from Government Minister of Equatorial Guinea” (October 25, 2011)
    2) Department of Justice, “Attorney General Holder at the African Union Summit” (July 25, 2010)
    3) Resolution 5/3-Facilitating International Cooperation In Asset Recovery
    4) In that regard, allow us to remind you of the operative clause that the US delegation attempted to include in the AR resolution while in Panama: [12bis. States requested to repatriate funds of illicit origin (…) have a responsibility towards societies affected by corruption to make every effort to achieve the repatriation of funds of illicit origin to the countries of origin in order to diminish the negative impact of non-repatriation, including on the enjoyment of human rights, in particular economic, social, and cultural rights in the countries of origin]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s